There is something deeply comforting about calling Donald Trump ‘stupid.’ I’m talking about premium, top-shelf, artisan stupid.
It’s not just the cheap insulting-comforting. Not just “that felt good to say” comforting. No, no. I mean the kind of comfort that lets you sip your tea, adjust your posture, and convince yourself that the empire is merely being run by a fool who will eventually trip over his own ego and fall face-first into an orange haze of irrelevance. Calling Trump stupid is emotionally convenient because it lets folks feel smarter than the problem.
Because if Donald Trump is stupid, then everything we’re enduring is terribly unserious. None of this is intentional, is it? It’s all a farce and a spectacle. The decisions are blunders. If he is stupid, then we are not witnessing strategy. The chaos is not intentional. It’s just . . . happening. We are witnessing something that can be observed with a raised brow and a knowing smirk while waiting, patiently, for the inevitable collapse. And most importantly, the danger is containable.
That’s the story people wanna believe right now. It’s convenient and soothing. Because the moment you consider that all this chaos may not be ‘stupidity,’ that this may, in fact, be purposeful in its chaos, then you lose that comfort entirely.
And right now, you can see that story being told over and over again in our media ecosystem. Check it. The New Republic just ran a piece framing Trump’s unlawful war with Iran as a product of his “deep stupidity.” Pundits keep echoing it. Social media amplifies it. Late-night hosts turn it into punchlines. The word stupid has become a kind of intellectual shortcut and a placeholder for analysis.
What the The New Republic piece does, very slickly and confidently, is reduce the entire situation to a personality diagnosis. It psychoanalyzes Trump. It mocks him. It turns him into a type: idiot, narcissist, clown. Its core argument is almost comically simple. They ask us to “imagine if the dumbest person in the world and humanity’s biggest asshole were the same person.” Then add a circle of equally unserious people, and voilà . . . we get war with Iran.
Everything that follows, from contradictory justifications, erratic alliances, to being “shocked” by predictable retaliation, is presented as evidence of Trump’s incompetence. The chaos is the explanation and the incoherence is the theory. It’s a clean, emotionally satisfying read because it tells you there’s nothing deeper to figure out. This is just what happens when a foolish man stumbles into power and starts pressing buttons.
But that’s also exactly where the argument it falls apart. Reducing everything to “he’s dumb” does two things: It underestimates the intentionality behind certain moves. And it overestimates how much competence is actually required to wield power effectively in a system that already enables it.
Sometimes what looks like chaos is opportunism. Sometimes what looks like ignorance is indifference to consequences that don’t affect you or your constituency. And sometimes it really is a lack of depth, but paired with enough instinct and institutional backing to still be dangerous.
Because what The New Republic piece calls “stupidity” is actually a pattern, Y’all. A pattern. And patterns require explanation, not dismissal.
When you see repeated escalation, constant raising of stakes, a willingness to absorb blowback, and an ability to keep dominating the political and media environment despite obvious contradictions and lies, you are no longer in the realm of random error. You are looking at a very astute mode of operating with historical logic.
The article treats inconsistency as proof of a lack of strategy, when in reality, inconsistency can function as strategy by keeping allies off balance, flooding the zone with explanations, and making it difficult to pin down intent. The article doesn’t grapple with the more uncomfortable possibility that this kind of chaos can be useful, that escalation can be deliberate, and that power does not require coherence to be effective. It only requires momentum and a system that allows it to continue.
The New Republic framing doesn’t actually explain anything to us. It explains away the very thing we should be trying to understand. Because calling Trump stupid dangerously lowers the stakes of what he’s doing. And folks stop asking the harder question: What if this isn’t stupidity at all? What if it’s escalation?
What is escalation?
Escalation, in a racialized capitalist system, is the deliberate raising of conflict, chaos, and stakes by those accustomed to dominance when they perceive that dominance slipping. They use disruption, risk, and instability as tools to hold onto power rather than adapt to sharing it.
Escalation doesn’t look like careful governance. It doesn’t look like policy papers and long-term planning. It looks messy as hell. It looks erratic. It looks like someone constantly raising the stakes, pushing boundaries, forcing reactions, and daring institutions to respond. It looks just like pure fucking chaos.
And if you’re committed to reading everything through the lens of intelligence versus stupidity, you will misread that chaos every single time. Because escalation isn’t about being “smart” in the way pundits like to measure it. It’s not about nuance or restraint or consensus-building. It’s about pressure, momentum, and creating conditions where normal rules stop working.
You don’t need to be a genius to do that. You need to be willing. You need to be unbothered by consequences that others fear. You need to understand how attention works. You need to know that crisis reshapes the field. And you need to believe, on some level, that the future is not secure. This is the part people don’t want to face.
A lot of what we are watching makes more sense if you understand it as politics under perceived threat. Not threat in the immediate, physical sense but threat to dominance, to control, to the assumption that power is stable and inherited. When people believe that the ground beneath them is shifting, they don’t play the same game. So they use confusion to exhaust opposition. Contradiction to muddy accountability. Constant crisis to collapse the space for deliberation and replace it with urgency, fear, and reaction.
History shows this pattern over and over again: destabilize, overwhelm, dominate the narrative, and then consolidate power in the name of restoring order. So if you understand how these processes work and if you understand how power behaves under perceived threat, then you stop asking whether this is “stupid.” You start recognizing that the goals are being met.
Racists like Donald Trump and his goons don’t invest in stability the same way. They don’t prioritize long-term equilibrium. They start gambling. And gambling doesn’t look like prudence. It looks like risk and brinkmanship. It looks like pushing things further than they “should” go, because the alternative, doing nothing, feels like losing slowly.
Now go back and look at how people describe Trump. They keep saying say he’s erratic, impulsive, and reckless. Maybe. But those same behaviors can also function as tools. They keep opponents off balance. They dominate the news cycle. They force constant reaction. They normalize higher levels of conflict over time. That is not the absence of logic. What we are seeing is a different kind of logic. And once you see that, the “stupidity” argument starts to look less like analysis and more like a coping mechanism.
Because it is easier, emotionally and intellectually, to believe that the most powerful man in the world is just an idiot than to grapple with the possibility that he is operating within a framework that rewards escalation, and that the system around him does not reliably stop it.
Calling him stupid reassures you that there is no method to the madness. It tells you that if you just wait long enough, the contradictions will collapse, the errors will accumulate, and the whole thing will fall apart.
What if that’s not how this works? What if this racist capitalist system is built to absorb those contradictions? What if the blunders don’t disqualify him, but actually strengthen his position with the very audience he needs? What if the appearance of chaos is part of how the power operates?
Now the conversation gets uncomfortable, right?
Because now folks have to stop laughing and start analyzing. You have to stop asking, “Why would he do something so fucking stupid?” and start asking, “What does this move accomplish?” You have to look at outcomes, not intentions. You have to look at who benefits. And once you start doing that, then a different picture comes into focus.
You see how escalation consolidates loyalty. You see how conflict energizes a base. You see how constant crisis makes everything feel urgent and binary. You see how the bar keeps moving. And you realize that calling all of this “stupid” doesn’t just miss the point. It helps to obscure it.
Because if you think this is stupidity, you will always be surprised by what comes next. You will keep expecting restraint where there is none. You will keep expecting correction where there is none. You will keep expecting the system to behave like it’s governed by norms that have already been abandoned. You will keep putting faith in the idea that this racist system will betray its founding principles.
And every time the stakes rise again, you’ll call it shocking. Unexpected. Unfuckingbelievable! When in reality, it is entirely consistent with a politics of escalation designed to burn the house down if it can’t be owned.
My point is that something can be reckless and still be effective. Something can be chaotic and still be strategic. Something can be destructive and still be intentional. And if you refuse to see that, you will keep misdiagnosing the moment we’re in.
The real danger isn’t that Donald Trump doesn’t know what he’s doing. It’s that you think he doesn’t. And it is in that misunderstanding where the real risk lives.
And let’s stop acting like any of this mess is coming out of nowhere. Project 2025 laid this all out for us, page by page, agency by agency. Expanding presidential power. Purging the federal workforce. Rewiring the Department of Justice. Rolling back civil rights protections. Restructuring K–12 education and higher ed to align with ideological control. Targeting DEI. Reasserting “law and order.” Tightening immigration enforcement. And, and, and . . . taking a far more aggressive, unilateral posture on foreign policy.
They told us exactly WTF they were gonna do. Out loud. In print. With bullet points. And now folks are watching it all unfold with Kaleidoscopic precision and calling it stupid.
Nahhhh.
This is not a man fumbling through power. This is a man executing within a blueprint that’s messy, yes. Chaotic, absolutely. But moving in a direction that was already mapped.
So the question ain’t, “Does this look stupid?” The question is: why are we still pretending it wasn’t planned?
Thanks for reading. If this piece resonated with you, then please consider becoming a paid subscriber. Paid subscriptions help keep my Substack unfiltered and ad free. They also help me raise money for HBCU journalism students who need laptops, DSLR cameras, tripods, mics, lights, software, travel funds for conferences and reporting trips, and food from our pantry. You can also follow me on Facebook!
We appreciate you!
