This week, Senate Republicans squabbled with a federal judge who voiced concerns about the transparency of a 2011 ethics review of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas during a judiciary subcommittee hearing. Thomas has faced heavy scrutiny over recent weeks following ProPublica’s exposé into his close relationship with Republican mega-donor Harlan Crow.

While Thomas insists he did not receive gifts from Crow in exchange for his political influence. Karen Hunter discusses the fallout.

TheHub.news is a storytelling and news platform committed to telling our stories through our lens.With unapologetic facts at the center, we document the lived reality of our experience globally—our progress, our challenges, and our impact—without distortion, dilution, or apology.

Exit mobile version